Evidence mapPaperPMID 42369375Full record

ReviewFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2026

Mechanistic insights into the synaptic damage-repair and regeneration processes in neurodegenerative Alzheimer's disease: phytochemicals as neuroprotective agents.

Bharti Yadav, Prabhakar Gangwar, Kirti Kumari, Anuradha Yadav, Rashmi Rao, Keshav Kumar, Harkomal Verma, Monisha Dhiman, Anil Kumar Mantha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bharti YadavDepartment of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Prabhakar GangwarDepartment of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Kirti KumariDepartment of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Anuradha YadavDepartment of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Rashmi RaoDepartment of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Keshav KumarDepartment of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Harkomal VermaDepartment of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Monisha DhimanDepartment of Microbiology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Anil Kumar ManthaDepartment of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic failure is one of the earliest and most significant contributors to the cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD), preceding extensive neuronal loss. Although amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) of tau protein characterize the disease, memory impairment primarily results from the gradual deterioration of synaptic communications. This decline is caused by a complex interaction among mitochondrial energy deficits, cytoskeletal instability, disrupted exosomal signaling, and immune-mediated synaptic pruning. Mitochondrial dysfunction, particularly affecting complexes I and IV, leads to reduced ATP production, faulty mitophagy and disrupted calcium (Ca

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecytoskeletonexosomesmitochondrial dysfunctionNETosisphytochemicalssynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID42369375
PMCPMC13294076

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.