Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369447›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026

The Italian landscape of digital therapeutics in a European context.

Giulia Ivagnes, Michela Di Pietro, Valentina Lacalamita, Davide De Pascale, Andrea Oliva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia IvagnesViatris Italia, Product Safety & Risk Management (PSRM), Milan, Italy.
Michela Di PietroViatris Italia, Regulatory Affairs, Milan, Italy.
Valentina LacalamitaViatris Italia, Medical Affairs, Milan, Italy.
Davide De PascaleViatris Italia, Quality Assurance, Milan, Italy.
Andrea OlivaViatris Italia, Product Safety & Risk Management (PSRM), Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and aim: Digital Therapeutics (DTx) are emerging as a key component of the modern healthcare landscape, offering evidence-based therapeutic interventions powered by software. Unlike wellness apps, DTx require robust clinical validation to demonstrate their efficacy in managing and treating diseases such as diabetes, anxiety, depression, and hypertension. Clinical trials evaluating DTx follow rigorous methodologies similar to traditional drug trials, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but also present unique challenges, such as the need for software updates and decentralized patient management. The aim of this narrative review is to examine the European landscape of clinical trials and the associated regulatory framework for DTx, followed by a focus on the current situation in Italy. Methods and results: To contextualize the development of digital therapeutics, existing literature was first reviewed to identify key therapeutic areas. A targeted analysis of clinical trials performed in Italy was conducted using ClinicalTrials.gov as the data source. Predefined keywords were applied, and retrieved records were screened based on relevance to DTx and applicability to the Italian context. Studies were included if they investigated digital interventions with therapeutic intent and were conducted in Italy. Following screening, 13 DTx-related clinical trials were identified, including 11 interventional and 2 observational studies. All interventional studies were randomized controlled trials at different stages of development. The analysis revealed heterogeneity in study design regarding control arm strategies, with approaches ranging from standard of care and active controls to no-treatment comparators and digital placebo conditions. Regulatory frameworks for DTx have evolved significantly, with the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR 2017/745) now recognizing stand-alone software as a medical device. This shift emphasizes the importance of regulatory compliance, risk classification, and continuous monitoring to ensure patient safety and therapeutic effectiveness. We also examined post-market surveillance responsibilities to provide an overview of key opportunities and considerations for stakeholders interested in commercializing a digital therapeutic. Discussion and conclusion: As DTx continue to gain traction, their integration into healthcare systems will depend on clinical evidence, regulatory adaptation, and user engagement. Future developments will likely focus on optimizing trial methodologies and enhancing digital endpoints to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical trialsdigital healthDTx (digital therapeutics)European UnionItalymedical device regulation (UE) 2017/745patient safety

Identifiers

PMID42369447
PMCPMC13294955

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.