ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2026
[Analysis of Factors Affecting Endoscopic Follow-up Compliance in High-Risk Patients With Early Gastrointestinal Cancer].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The random forest method was used to analyze the relationship between disease perception, doctor-patient communication, cognitive load, and the compliance of high-risk patients with early digestive tract cancer regarding endoscopic re-examination. Methods: A total of 303 patients at high risk for early digestive tract cancer from January 2022 to December 2022 were selected as research subjects. Questionnaire surveys were conducted using general information questionnaires, a simplified disease perception questionnaire, a doctor-patient communication evaluation scale, and various cognitive load scales. Spearman analysis was used to examine the relationships among disease perception, doctor-patient communication, cognitive load, and compliance with endoscopic reexamination in patients at high risk for early digestive tract cancer. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify factors influencing patients' compliance with endoscopic reexamination. A random forest model was used to rank the importance of characteristic variables for compliance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model efficacy, and five-fold cross-validation was applied for validation. Results: Spearman analysis showed that poor compliance with endoscopic re-examination among patients at high risk for early digestive tract cancer was negatively correlated with disease perception and doctor-patient communication ( Conclusion: Disease perception, doctor-patient communication, cognitive load, average monthly household income, age, and family history of digestive tract tumors are key factors influencing compliance with endoscopic re-examination in patients with early digestive tract cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.