Evidence mapPaperPMID 42369762Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026

Unbiased distance correlation with sample-size-aware confidence bounds for comparative omics network analysis.

Miroslava Cuperlovic-Culf, Anuradha Surendra, Irina Alecu, Abdullah Mahdi, Finn Archinuk, Hosna Jabbari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miroslava Cuperlovic-CulfDigital Technologies Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Anuradha SurendraDigital Technologies Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Irina AlecuDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Abdullah MahdiDigital Technologies Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Finn ArchinukDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Hosna JabbariDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Data-driven determination is a powerful approach for unbiased investigation of the functional relationships in biomolecular networks. Such networks can be inferred from omics data, where correlation analysis is a commonly used method. However, the correlation values depend strongly on sample variability and size of the sample set in the general case, leading to unstable results and possibly highly erroneous conclusions. Methods: In this work, we show that similar to the Pearson and Spearman correlation approaches, distance correlation as a general non-linear polytonic correlation method also depends on the sample size. We show that both the Results: We integrated bias-corrected distance correlation with sample-size-matched bootstrapping, chi-squared Conclusion: We present a method for unbiased distance correlation network derivation with permutations and comparisons between the sample groups. All approaches presented here are available through an online application (https://www.insilicobiology.ca/shiny/sidco+/), and all related code is available at https://github.com/computationalmetabolomicsca/sidco_plus.

Indexed as

Bernstein related inequalitiesbioinformatics network analysisbioinformatics softwarecorrelation analysisHoeffding inequalitymetabolomics analysissample size error estimateunbiased distance correlation

Identifiers

PMID42369762
PMCPMC13294210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.