ReviewInternational journal of women's dermatology2026
Safety and clinical considerations of alopecia therapies during pregnancy, fertility treatment, and polycystic ovary syndrome workup.
Review in International journal of women's dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety of alopecia treatments during pregnancy, in-vitro fertilization (IVF), and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) workup, with a focus on potential maternal and fetal risks. Data sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from November 2024 to December 2024. Search terms included medication names in combination with "pregnancy," "IVF," "in-vitro fertilization," and "PCOS." Study selection: Peer-reviewed studies addressing the use of therapies for androgenetic alopecia, alopecia areata, and scarring alopecias in the contexts of pregnancy, IVF, and PCOS were included. Articles evaluating maternal safety, fetal risks, and treatment timing were prioritized. Only English-language publications were reviewed. Results: Despite increasing therapeutic options for alopecia, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding their safety during pregnancy. Pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials, leading to a reliance on older treatments with limited data on dosing or pharmacokinetics in the pregnant population. Unfortunately, there are few alopecia medications with robust safety data in pregnancy, and many medications are contraindicated during this period. Some medications may be used with caution, while others require additional investigation. During IVF, there are alopecia medications with potential benefit in women experiencing implantation failure or PCOS. For patients undergoing PCOS workup, some alopecia medications may impact hormonal labs or mask PCOS symptoms. Conclusion: There is a critical need for more targeted research on alopecia treatments in pregnancy, IVF, and PCOS contexts. This review provides current evidence to guide clinicians and support informed, individualized treatment decisions during this vulnerable period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.