Evidence mapPaperPMID 42370199Full record

ArticleExtended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2026

More Older Adults Try Patient Portals in Recent Years, but Many Don't Continue: A Meta-Analysis.

Nina Sakhnini, Debaleena Chattopadhyay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nina SakhniniComputer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1158-1854
Debaleena ChattopadhyayComputer Science, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-9905

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG083255 · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · 2025 to 2025
$669k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG083255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient portals are a convenient way for patients to communicate with healthcare providers and manage care. Active portal engagement is associated with enhanced knowledge, increased self-efficacy, and improved symptom management. However, gaps in portal use persist, particularly among older adults. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of studies published between 2005 and 2025, with publication year as a moderator. From 1,487 unique records, 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. We found that an estimated 55% of older adults have used a patient portal at least once, and 49% were continuing users, although these rates varied widely across studies. Publication year was a significant moderator for ever having used a patient portal, suggesting increasing uptake over time, but was not significantly associated with continued use. These findings suggest that improving onboarding alone may not be sufficient; ongoing tech support is needed to sustain long-term patient portal engagement among older adults.

Indexed as

continued usemeta-analysisolder adultspatient portals

Identifiers

PMID42370199
PMCPMC13308762

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.