ReviewInfection and drug resistance2026
Antimicrobial Peptides Against Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria: Focus on Machine Learning.
Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Resolution Melting Curve Analysis (HRMA) for the Identification of Class D β-Lactamases (CHDLs) inInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a pressing public health threat of the 21st century, with an estimated ten million deaths annually from drug-resistant infections by 2050. Diminishing pipelines and the accelerating emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens make the development of novel antibacterials more urgent than ever. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are among the most promising alternatives to conventional drugs, exhibiting broad antimicrobial spectra, rapid kinetics, and mechanisms that are difficult for bacteria to circumvent. However, the problem of discovering and engineering clinically useful AMPs with desirable properties out of large sequence spaces remains unsolved by traditional approaches. Machine learning (ML) enables fast screening of millions of compounds, generation of de novo sequences with predicted therapeutic potential, and simultaneous multiobjective optimisation of efficacy, safety, stability, and manufacturability. This review provides a critical appraisal of the current advances and prospective directions in computational discovery of AMPs that can combat resistant strains, focusing on available resources for machine learning in the domain of bioinformatics, evaluation of existing approaches to modeling peptide structure, activity, and interactions ranging from classical ML algorithms to DL and generative artificial intelligence (AI) models, and a practical roadmap of how the AMP discovery pipeline could proceed towards animal studies and clinical application through the use of active learning, fine-tuned protein language models, structural graph neural networks, and other modern techniques. Finally, we discuss challenges that may hinder a successful transition from ML-assisted design to the clinic and offer actionable recommendations to overcome them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.