Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42370234›Full record

ArticleAnnals of statistics2026

Towards a Unified Theory for Semiparametric Data Fusion with Individual-Level Data.

Ellen Graham, Marco Carone, Andrea Rotnitzky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Combining Observational Studies to Reduce Multiple Biases.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ellen GrahamDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington.
Marco CaroneDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington.
Andrea RotnitzkyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington.

Funding

SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
STATISTICAL ISSUES IN AIDS RESEARCHR37AI029168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES P HUGHES · 1999 to 2026
$9.8M
Statistical Methods for Incorporating Machine Learning Tools in Inference and Large-Scale Surveillance using Electronic Medical Records DataR01HL137808 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CARONE, MARCO · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137808NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI029168NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider inference about a finite-dimensional parameter integrating samples from independent sources. A recently developed theory considers scenarios where sources align with subsets of the conditional distributions of a single factorization of the joint target distribution. While this theory applies in many settings, it falls short in important data fusion problems, such as two-sample instrumental variable analysis, settings that integrate data from epidemiological studies with diverse designs, and studies with mismeasured variables supplemented by external validation studies. In this paper, we derive a comprehensive theory that, in particular, covers these settings by allowing the integration of sources aligned with conditional distributions that do not correspond to a single factorization of the target distribution. We provide a universal characterization of the influence functions of regular and asymptotically linear estimators and the efficient influence function of a target parameter, irrespective of the parameter of interest or the statistical model for the target distribution, thus paving the way for a unified theory for machine-learning debiased, semiparametric efficient estimation.

Identifiers

PMID42370234
PMCPMC13308689

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.