ArticleResearch square2026
From Counseling to Capacity: Patient-Care-Team Perspectives on Healthy Eating Support in Underserved Community Clinics.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Healthy eating supports diabetes management and may reduce colorectal cancer risk, yet patients in underserved clinic settings often face structural barriers that limit dietary behavior change. This study examined patient-care-team and health-system factors influencing diet counseling, nutrition referral, and food-resource linkage in two community clinics. Methods: Before launching a patient-facing colorectal cancer and colon-healthy nutrition education intervention, we conducted an exploratory study to inform the intervention design with 23 patient-care-team members from two community-based clinics serving medically underserved populations. Participants completed semi-structured interviews supplemented by a brief descriptive survey. Interviews examined diabetes-related diet counseling, colorectal cancer risk-reduction nutrition, nutrition referral, food access, cultural food practices, and clinic workflow barriers. Survey items assessed knowledge of diets to prevent colorectal cancer, familiarity with diet-related risks and benefits, counseling practices, resources, and perceived patient barriers. Transcripts were analyzed using deductive codes based on interview domains and inductive refinement based on recurring patterns. Survey data were summarized descriptively. Results: Participants described diet counseling as important, particularly for patients with diabetes, but often constrained by limited time, competing visit priorities, referral availability, and patient social needs. Themes included routine but variably structured counseling; diabetes-focused counseling that created opportunities to reinforce colorectal cancer risk-reduction nutrition; barriers related to affordability, food access, housing, cooking resources, and competing priorities; the need for culturally responsive counseling; inconsistent availability or use of nutrition referrals and food-resource linkages; and variable patient-care-team knowledge, training, and confidence. Among all participants, 61% rated their knowledge of diets to prevent colorectal cancer as low, very low, or "don't know." Among role-applicable participants, 23% reported counseling patients about dietary changes to prevent colorectal cancer at every visit. Conclusion: In underserved clinics, healthy eating support should move beyond brief advice toward resource-linked, culturally responsive care pathways that connect counseling, referral, food access support, and follow-up.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.