ReviewSAGE open nursing
Resilience-Building Interventions and Advanced Life Support Competency for Emergency Nurses in Palestinian Hospitals: A Scoping Review.
Review in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency nurses in Palestinian hospitals operate under chronic stress related to political instability, resource constraints, and high trauma exposure. These conditions may affect both psychological resilience and Advanced Life Support (ALS) competency, yet the evidence base remains unclear. This scoping review sought to map the available body of literature about psychological resilience and ALS competency among emergency nurses in Palestine, identify gaps in research, and determine the relationship between psychological resilience and ALS competency, which is the core focus of this review. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines and JBI scoping review methodology, a comprehensive search of seven electronic databases and grey literature was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and January 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using a standardized, pilot-tested charting form. Findings were synthesized descriptively using narrative synthesis organized around the review objectives. Results: From 1,292 records identified, 18 studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies were descriptive or correlational (94.4%). Burnout prevalence among emergency nurses ranged from 64% to 72.9%, and substantial gaps in ALS/BLS knowledge were reported, including low accuracy in resuscitation sequence identification (26.6%). Only one intervention study was identified, evaluating simulation-based BLS training. No studies were found that assessed resilience-based or comprehensive programs which address psychological wellbeing and clinical competency issues. There were no studies that specifically analyzed the connection between psychological resilience and competency in ALS. Conclusion: The existing literature on Palestinian emergency nurses is dominated by descriptive studies, with a marked absence of intervention research. Despite documented psychological distress and clinical competency gaps, no studies have evaluated psychological resilience-focused or integrated interventions. This review highlights critical evidence gaps and provides a foundation for future intervention-oriented research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.