ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
An alternative dietary variety score reflects nutrient adequacy across different life stages in Japanese women.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Dietary Variety Score (DVS) is a simple indicator of dietary variety widely used in Japan, particularly among older adults. However, its applicability to younger populations remains uncertain, and some components-most notably "fats and oils"-may not fully reflect current nutritional priorities, including the promotion of whole grains for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases. We developed an Alternative Dietary Variety Score (ADVS) and examined whether the original and alternative scores capture food group and nutrient intake, as well as nutrient adequacy, among women across different life stages. Methods: The cross-sectional study included 4,227 young (mean age 18.2 years), 3,562 middle-aged (47.8 years), and 1,655 older (74.6 years) Japanese women. Dietary intake was assessed using a comprehensive Diet History Questionnaire for young and middle-aged women and a brief-type Diet History Questionnaire for older women. The DVS was calculated based on the weekly consumption frequency of ten food groups, assigning one point for each food group consumed at least once per day. The ADVS retained the original scoring framework but replaced "fats and oils" with "whole grains." Associations with food groups and nutrient intake were examined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, and nutrient adequacy was evaluated based on the Dietary Reference Intakes for Japanese. Results: Both DVS and ADVS were positively associated with the intake of vegetables, fruits, fish and shellfish, eggs, soy products, dairy, seaweeds, and potatoes. The ADVS additionally reflected whole-grain consumption, while correlations with fats and oils were attenuated. Both scores were positively correlated with intakes of protein, dietary fiber, vitamins, and minerals across age groups. Higher scores were associated with a lower prevalence of inadequate nutrient intake across all age groups. The ADVS showed somewhat higher correlations with dietary fiber, vitamins B Conclusion: Both the DVS and ADVS are useful proxies of nutrient adequacy among young, middle-aged, and older Japanese women. The ADVS additionally reflected whole-grain consumption and showed a different pattern of correlations with several nutrients, suggesting that incorporating whole grains into a dietary variety index may provide an alternative perspective on dietary variety while maintaining simplicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.