ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Evaluating the anti-gut dysbiotic potential of bioactive primary metabolites derivatives from
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intestinal dysbiosis is a disorder of the gut microbiome, characterized by a loss of equilibrium between the microorganisms found in the gastrointestinal tract and their hosts. It leads to metabolic changes in both the gut and in the body's inflammatory response, and adversely affects the epithelial cells that line the intestines. This article aimed to study the mechanisms whereby three metabolites, produced from Methods: Using a variety of in-silico methods, including ADMET modeling and prediction, docking of two target proteins, Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 4 (FABP4) and B-Raf Proto-Oncogene, Serine/Threonine Kinase (BRAF), and molecular normal mode analysis and network pharmacology, we investigated the potential interaction of these compounds. Dynamics simulation was performed using GROMACS (2019.2) and GROMOS96 (43a1) force fields. Results and discussion: ADMET indicates good oral absorption, moderate ability to dissolve in your intestinal tract (lipophilicity), and low toxicity when consumed. Additionally, molecular docking techniques indicated that metabolite-protein binding is stable via primarily hydrophobic bonds, hydrogen bonds, and all have similar binding energies in the range of -5.1 to -6.2 kcal/mol. Normal mode analysis and dynamic simulation confirmed that the metabolite-protein complexes were stable. Network pharmacology studies suggest that the use of Conclusion: This work demonstrates the protective potential against intestinal dysbiosis of primary metabolites of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.