ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Evaluating the Effect on Emmetropization of the Timing and Spectrum of Breaks From a Myopiagenic Environment.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Here, we use a tree shrew model of slowly progressing childhood myopia to evaluate how regular breaks from a myopiagenic visual environment affect the development of myopia. Methods: At 24 days of visual experience (DVE), 36 tree shrews were exposed to myopiagenic ambient light consisting of limited-bandwidth blue and cyan, which was then interrupted by various patterns and durations of white or narrowband red ambient light. Seven animals raised in colony lighting served as controls. Refractions at 100 DVE were compared across the groups. Results: Relative to emmetropic controls, animals raised in blue + cyan light showed a gradual myopic shift (-4.7 ± 0.9 SEM diopters [D] at 100 DVE, P < 0.001). For white light, 20-second breaks every 20 minutes were ineffective in preventing myopia (-5.9 ± 2.3 SEM D, P = 0.004). Both 5-minute (-1.5 ± 0.2 SEM D) and 10-minute (-1.1 ± 0.1 SEM D) white-light breaks every 20 minutes were only partially effective. Narrowband red light for 10 minutes every hour induced significant hyperopia (+4.4 ± 0.6 SEM D). Despite relatively higher variance, red light 10 minutes every 2 hours and 20 minutes twice a day also inhibited myopia (+1.1 ± 1.3 and -0.8 ± 1.3 SEM D). Conclusions: While white-light breaks were relatively ineffective in inhibiting myopia, data showed that short breaks with ambient red light can be very effective if of an appropriate kind. The results suggest that using breaks from myopiagenic activity to stop or slow myopic progression depends critically on both the timing and nature of the breaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.