ArticleJournal of medical virology2026
An Explainable Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Incident Myocardial Injury in Patients With Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome.
Article in Journal of medical virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Explainable Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Incident Myocardial Injury in Patients With Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome.Journal of medical virology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop an explainable machine learning-based model to enable early prediction of incident myocardial injury during hospitalization among patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS). This multicenter retrospective cohort study included and analyzed clinical data from 1,088 patients with SFTS who were hospitalized for the first time across four medical institutions between May 2011 and October 2024. The dataset was randomly split into an internal training set and a test set at a 7:3 ratio. After candidate predictors were selected from baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory indices, nine machine learning models were developed and compared, and external validation was conducted using retrospective cohorts from two independent medical centers. SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret model predictions and quantify feature importance. The ten key predictors identified comprised five baseline clinical characteristics and five laboratory indices. The CatBoost model demonstrated robust predictive performance in the internal test set and across two external validation cohorts, with AUCs of 0.750 (95% CI 0.698-0.803), 0.704 (95% CI 0.555-0.853), and 0.729 (95% CI 0.573-0.886), respectively. SHAP analysis further identified clinically relevant risk thresholds for the key laboratory predictors. In conclusion, this study developed a CatBoost-based machine learning model that enables early prediction, at the time of hospital admission, of the risk of incident myocardial injury during hospitalization among patients with SFTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.