Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371017›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

The role of

Lili Lin, Wenxin Wang, Jing Yan, Yafei Zhang, Shuye Yang, Xue Wen, Kui Zhao, Jun Zhang, Xinhui Su

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lili LinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Wenxin WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jing YanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yafei ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Shuye YangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xue WenDepartment of Pathology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Kui ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China. 1505156@zju.edu.cn.
Xinhui SuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China. suxinhui@zju.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-3982

Funding

Major plan of Jointly Constructed project by the Science and Technology Department of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the Zhejiang Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine GZY-ZJ-KJ-24025National High Performance Medical Device Innovation Center Innovation Fund NMED2024CX-01-002National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFF0716000National Natural Science Foundation of China 82472013Zhejiang Province Vanguard Plan Project 2025C01111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) is a rare malignant neoplasm arising in extrahepatic tissues and organs, and its prompt and correct diagnosis remains clinically challenging.

methodsA total of 66 patients with pathologically confirmed HAC underwent 71

resultsAmong 44 patients with initial HAC, the stomach was the most common primary tumor site (26/44, 59.1%). All primary tumors, with the exception of those of ovarian origin, exhibited increased FDG uptake, with a median SUVmax of 9.25. Elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were observed in 79.5% (35/44) of patients at initial diagnosis. A majority of patients (24/44, 54.5%) presented with distant metastases at the time of initial diagnosis, where the liver was the most common metastatic site (16/44, 36.4%), followed by distant lymph nodes (8/44, 18.2%) and bone (5/44, 11.4%). Notably, 50.0% (2/4) of T1-stage tumors had already developed distant metastases. The findings of

conclusion

Indexed as

18F-FDG PET/CTClinical impactFollow-upHepatoid adenocarcinomaRestagingStaging

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.