ReviewNeuroradiology2026
Conductive hearing loss and normal CT: a clinical perspective.
Review in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis article presents clinical scenarios in which patients with conductive hearing loss may not have an explanatory finding on temporal bone CT.
methodsA literature review regarding patients with conductive hearing loss and no attributable imaging findings was performed. Illustrative examples correlating audiological exams and photon counting detector CT scans are provided. Common explanations of conductive hearing loss, e.g.: otosclerosis, are reviewed.
conclusionPatients with conductive hearing loss are assumed to have attributable imaging findings on temporal bone CT. While this is true in many cases, no imaging study is 100% accurate, and pathophysiological conditions resulting in conductive hearing loss exist for which temporal bone CT may not be sensitive. Radiologists should keep these conditions in mind to avoid over-interpreting exam findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371033What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.