ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Dynamic effects of different exercise modalities on autonomic recovery: a longitudinal study based on heart rate variability.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Wearable-Derived Autonomic Component Is Associated with Cardiovascular Health in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the Longevity Check-Up 8+ Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Post-exercise recovery is a critical window for physiological adaptation, with the autonomic nervous system (ANS) playing a key regulatory role. However, whether long-term training with different modalities systematically influences post-exercise ANS recovery remains unclear. This study investigated the long-term effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and resistance training (RT) on post-exercise ANS recovery assessed by heart rate variability (HRV) in healthy adults. Methods Three independent cohorts completed 12 weeks of MICT, HIIT, or RT (3 sessions per week). 5-minute continuous HRV data were collected immediately after each session. Recovery slopes of the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) and low-frequency/high-frequency power (LF/HF) ratio were calculated. Linear mixed-effects models analyzed trends in recovery slopes across training weeks, with pre-exercise resting HRV and prior-night insomnia score as covariates. Results A total of 43 participants (MICT: n = 13; HIIT: n = 16; RT: n = 14) completed the intervention, yielding 1393 training observations. RMSSD recovery slope decreased significantly in MICT (b=-0.165, P = 0.003), but not in HIIT (b = 0.019, P = 0.680) or RT (b=-0.037, P = 0.452). Between-group comparisons showed a significant difference between HIIT and MICT (Δb = 0.184, P = 0.030). Pre-exercise resting RMSSD (β = 0.022, P < 0.001) and prior-night insomnia score (β = 0.052, P = 0.021) significantly influenced RMSSD recovery slope. No observable trend was detected in LF/HF ratio recovery slopes. Conclusion Long-term training with different exercise modalities differentially affects post-exercise ANS recovery. MICT potentially promotes economical autonomic adaptation; HIIT maintains rapid recovery capacity; RT exerts weaker effects. Pre-exercise resting RMSSD and sleep quality may serve as practical markers for daily training monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42371083What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.