ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2026
Comparison of microbial profiles between hospital wastewater and river water.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the microbial profiles between hospital wastewater and river water to assess the dissemination of clinical isolates into the environment. Two types of water samples were collected from sampling sites which were geographically close (wastewater from the University Hospital of Larissa and river water from the Pineios River). Gram-negative bacteria isolated from both sample types were identified using MALDI-TOF. Furthermore, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics were evaluated. A total of 54 Gram-negative isolates, belonging to diverse species, were collected from wastewater sample and river sample. All isolates were classified as MDR, exhibiting resistance to at least one agent from more than three different antibiotic classes. Based on species identification and susceptibility profiles, 27 isolates (19 from wastewater and 8 from river-water) were selected to be further characterized by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Analysis of WGS data, revealed the presence of different STs, even in isolates belonging to the same bacterial species. Additionally, WGS data showed that carbapenemase-encoding genes were identified in the majority of isolates. PlasmidFinder identified a huge variety of plasmid replicons among the isolates studied. In conclusion, both hospital wastewater and river water contained isolates carrying clinically relevant resistance determinants, such as carbapenemase-encoding genes. The presence of these pathogenic bacteria in the river poses a significant public health concern. Although we could not identify the origin of MDR bacteria in the river sample, these findings highlight the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance in the environment and underscore the urgent need for improved treatment methods and stricter surveillance to control its spread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.