ReviewNature and science of sleep2026
From Therapeutic Heterogeneity to Precision Neuromodulation: Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Chronic Insomnia.
Review in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic insomnia is linked to impaired daytime functioning, diminished quality of life, and heightened psychiatric and cardiometabolic risks. While cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia and pharmacotherapy are well-established treatments, their clinical effectiveness may be constrained by limited accessibility, incomplete response, relapse, adherence challenges, or adverse effects. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has therefore attracted increasing interest as a potential adjunctive or alternative intervention because it may modulate cortical excitability, large-scale brain networks, sleep-related oscillations, and autonomic function. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for chronic insomnia. Particular attention is given to therapeutic heterogeneity across stimulation targets, parameters, treatment schedules, patient phenotypes, and outcome measures. Available studies suggest potential improvements in subjective sleep quality and selected objective sleep parameters; however, the evidence remains limited by small sample sizes, variable sham designs, short follow-up durations, and inconsistent findings across modalities. We further propose a precision neuromodulation framework based on individualized functional targeting, biomarker-informed patient stratification, closed-loop feedback regulation, and integration with behavioral or pharmacological treatment pathways. This review highlights the translational promise of NIBS and outlines methodological priorities needed to move from heterogeneous evidence toward clinically reliable precision neuromodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.