ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2026
Substrate elasticity controls fibroblast motility on non-oxidized PDMS under weak adhesion.
Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac fibroblasts play a pivotal role in heart tissue dynamics, responding to mechanical and interfacial cues in their microenvironment. This study examines how substrate stiffness and surface condition influence the motility and morphology of chicken embryonic cardiac fibroblasts cultured on collagen-coated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with approximate elastic moduli of ~10 kPa and ~400 kPa, representing mechanically soft and stiff conditions, respectively. The PDMS surfaces were used without plasma or UV/ozone treatment, retaining their native hydrophobic character without surface oxidation. This absence of surface activation resulted in weak cell-substrate adhesion, leading to delayed spreading and frequent partial detachment during migration. Using time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy, we observed irregular motility cycles characterized by contraction-driven retraction, followed by partial detachment and re-adhesion. On soft substrates, fibroblasts exhibited longer motility cycles and left trailing edges upon retraction, while on stiff substrates, cells remained rounded and displayed less polarized motion. Quantitative analysis revealed that the duration of static phases and the degree of cell elongation varied with substrate stiffness but were also strongly influenced by adhesion instability due to unoxidized PDMS surfaces. These findings clarify the roles of substrate stiffness and surface adhesion in regulating fibroblast motility, and demonstrate that non-oxidized PDMS surfaces-though less adhesive-can preserve a rounded, less-spread cell morphology. Rather than promoting full spreading, such conditions may maintain fibroblasts in a mechanically less engaged or undifferentiated state. This work provides insight into how surface condition and mechanics together shape fibroblast behavior, with implications for mechanobiology and in vitro model design using non-activated biomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.