ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Neuronal excitability and parameter variability in the Hodgkin-Huxley model.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biophysically detailed neuron models are often built as a one-way pipeline in which voltage-clamp data are reduced to a single set of best-fit channel parameters, which are then combined into a deterministic spiking model. This practice discards experimentally observed scatter and fitting uncertainty, obscuring the mechanisms by which robustness and degeneracy arise in excitable systems. Here, I reintroduce fitted-parameter uncertainty into the Hodgkin-Huxley model and embed uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis into model construction. I digitized sodium and potassium rate-constant data from the original Hodgkin and Huxley figures and used bootstrap resampling to estimate uncertainty in the fitted voltage-dependent kinetic parameters. I then propagated these uncertainty estimates through a spatially extended squid axon cable model using large-scale Monte Carlo simulations, in which each sample defined a complete set of kinetic, conductance, passive, and structural parameters. At the channel level, first-order Sobol sensitivity indices revealed that all kinetic parameters contribute to output variance in a strongly time-dependent manner, with distinct parameters controlling transient and steady-state behavior for potassium and sodium conductances. At the level of neuronal excitability, the simulations produced a heterogeneous population of firing behaviors, including non-firing, phasic, regular, and spontaneous activity. Across stimulus amplitudes, the dominant firing mode was a single spike at stimulus onset, consistent with the physiological role of the squid giant axon in rapid escape behavior. The canonical 1952 Hodgkin-Huxley parameter set fell within the regularly firing minority subpopulation, rather than representing a unique or dominant solution. In the phasic subpopulation, action potential propagation and conduction velocity varied widely yet remained within experimental ranges. Finally, global sensitivity analysis during spiking showed uniformly small first-order Sobol indices but large total-order indices, indicating that excitability is governed primarily by strong interactions among all parameters rather than by any subset. Together, these results support reframing the Hodgkin-Huxley model as an experimentally constrained ensemble of behaviors rather than a single privileged parameter set, with physiologically relevant firing patterns emerging from structured regions of the parameter space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.