Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42373230›Full record

ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics

Glucose and Glutamine Define Independent Activation-Braking Metabolic States in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells.

Elizabeth A Mazzio, Renee Reams, Ramesh B Badisa, Jean Baptiste Lamango, Zonelle Hanley, Karam F A Soliman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth A MazzioCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, U.S.A.
Renee ReamsCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, U.S.A.
Ramesh B BadisaCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, U.S.A.
Jean Baptiste LamangoCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, U.S.A.
Zonelle HanleyCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, U.S.A.
Karam F A SolimanCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, U.S.A. karam.soliman@famu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimCancer metabolism is often viewed as a cooperative reliance on glucose and glutamine; however, whether these nutrients can enforce discrete, non-overlapping metabolic states remains unclear. This study aimed to isolate nutrient-specific regulatory programs. MATERIALS AND

methodsMDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells were cultured under four distinct metabolic environments: glucose/glutamine nutrient-repleted (fed), dual glucose/glutamine deficiency, and isolated repletion of either glucose or glutamine. Groups were evaluated for integrated transcriptomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic profiles to identify only the non-redundant, nutrient-enforced architectures.

resultsThe data show a mutually restrictive mechanistic state. Glutamine functions as a metabolic architect, restoring glycolytic enzyme transcripts (without lactate production), while inducing PDK1/3 which would decouple glycolysis from the TCA cycle. These changes are concomitant with a glutamine flux toward reductive TCA-driven lipogenesis, citric acid overflow, sterol synthesis (SREBF1/2), structural membrane expansion (phospholipids/sphingolipids) and the unique production of alanine as a nitrogen pool, independent of glycolytic flux. Conversely, glucose alone acts as the executor, licensing chromatin engagement, DNA replication, and mitotic progression. Glucose alone resolved ER stress, restored hexose-phosphate-derived glycosylation (mannose-6-phosphate), enabled lactic acid production, and diverted excess carbon into a triglyceride storage pool (>40% of lipids). Notably, each nutrient suppressed core elements of the other's program, revealing a reciprocal activation-braking system. Interestingly, ATP yield from glucose or glutamine alone were comparable, but not arbitrary; instead, aligned with the functional state of the cell. Glucose alone supported glycolytic phosphorylation and proliferative execution, as marked by lactate accumulation, whereas glutamine alone supported Krebs cycle-related phosphorylation, characterized by citrate accumulation and the maintenance of cellular structure and membrane infrastructure.

conclusionGlucose and glutamine enforce a balance of two independent, reciprocally regulated metabolic states. This data provides a systems-level explanation for metabolic resilience in cancer and may lead to the identification of nutrient-specific targets for combination therapy.

Indexed as

GlucoseGlutamineTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGlycolysisHumansMDA-MB-231 CellsMetabolic ReprogrammingGlucoseGlutamineanaplerosisbreast cancerCancer metabolismER stressglucose–glutamine reciprocityglutaminolysislipid remodelingmetabolic plasticitynutrient-enforced metabolic statesoxidative phosphorylationPDKpyruvate dehydrogenase kinasesubstrate-level phosphorylationtranscriptional state controlWarburg effect

Identifiers

PMID42373230
PMCPMC13321709

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.