Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42373620›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Field-induced non-linear magnetic responses of all-metal Jellium σ-aromats.

Xinglan Deng, John A Seed, Josef Tomeček, Adam Brookfield, Floriana Tuna, Benjamin L L Réant, Ashley J Wooles, Nikolas Kaltsoyannis, Stephen T Liddle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xinglan DengDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Radiochemistry Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
John A SeedDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Radiochemistry Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-0325
Josef TomečekDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Radiochemistry Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-7393
Adam BrookfieldDepartment of Chemistry and Photon Science Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Floriana TunaDepartment of Chemistry and Photon Science Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5541-1750
Benjamin L L RéantDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Radiochemistry Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ashley J WoolesDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Radiochemistry Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-9627
Nikolas KaltsoyannisDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Radiochemistry Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. nikolas.kaltsoyannis@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-5742
Stephen T LiddleDepartment of Chemistry and Centre for Radiochemistry Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. steve.liddle@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-8778

Funding

EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013)) 612724EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101166026RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/M027015/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/S033181/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/T011289/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/V035231/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/W014521/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/W029057/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent times all-metal aromaticity has arisen, challenging classical views of aromaticity. All-metal aromaticity invokes metal-metal bonding, but this remains rare for the actinides. Recently, one-electron trithorium superatom clusters exhibiting exalted diamagnetism and hence open-shell Jellium aromaticity have been reported. Those clusters complement closed-shell two-electron congeners, but computational assessments advanced conflicting interpretations. Here, we report one- and two-electron trithorium clusters that all exhibit exalted diamagnetism, demonstrating open- and closed-shell Jellium aromaticities. We show that these Jellium aromats exhibit non-linear magnetic responses, so a foundational assumption of ring current calculations is not met, accounting for the experimental-computational disagreement. This work suggests that while π-aromaticity results from preorganized coherent wave functions, for σ-aromats there may be an electronic reorganization barrier to cohesive wave functions and Jellium aromatic ring currents. This work demonstrates the importance of caution when using ring current calculations to assign aromatic character if the experimental magnetic response is not understood.

Identifiers

PMID42373620
PMCPMC13458622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.