ArticleNature communications2026
Field-induced non-linear magnetic responses of all-metal Jellium σ-aromats.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Field-induced non-linear magnetic responses of all-metal Jellium σ-aromats.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent times all-metal aromaticity has arisen, challenging classical views of aromaticity. All-metal aromaticity invokes metal-metal bonding, but this remains rare for the actinides. Recently, one-electron trithorium superatom clusters exhibiting exalted diamagnetism and hence open-shell Jellium aromaticity have been reported. Those clusters complement closed-shell two-electron congeners, but computational assessments advanced conflicting interpretations. Here, we report one- and two-electron trithorium clusters that all exhibit exalted diamagnetism, demonstrating open- and closed-shell Jellium aromaticities. We show that these Jellium aromats exhibit non-linear magnetic responses, so a foundational assumption of ring current calculations is not met, accounting for the experimental-computational disagreement. This work suggests that while π-aromaticity results from preorganized coherent wave functions, for σ-aromats there may be an electronic reorganization barrier to cohesive wave functions and Jellium aromatic ring currents. This work demonstrates the importance of caution when using ring current calculations to assign aromatic character if the experimental magnetic response is not understood.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.