Evidence mapPaperPMID 42374013Full record

ReviewPulmonary therapy2026

COPD Biologics: Right Patient, Right Pathway, Right Time.

Lydia J Finney, Francesca M Conway, Dheeraj K Sethi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pulmonary therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lydia J FinneyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK. L.finney@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-9513
Francesca M ConwayNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Dheeraj K SethiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease that is entering a new era in precision medicine. Advances in disease endotyping have challenged the traditional view of COPD as a uniformly neutrophilic disorder and revealed biologically distinct subgroups in whom targeted immunomodulation may be effective. Reproducible signatures of type 2 (T2) inflammation and epithelial-derived alarmin activation have emerged as actionable pathways, reshaping therapeutic development in COPD. This narrative review synthesises mechanistic insights and clinical trial evidence for biologic therapies targeting key T2 cytokines such as interleukin-5 (IL-5) IL-4/IL-13 and upstream epithelial alarmins, including interleukin-33 (IL-33) and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). We examine why earlier approaches targeting neutrophilic inflammation failed, and how biomarker-driven trial design has enabled success in selected populations. Across these programmes, therapeutic efficacy has depended not only on the pathway targeted but also on patient selection, disease stage and timing of intervention. We propose that the future of biologics in COPD lies in integrating biomarkers, treatable traits and longitudinal phenotyping to align the right patient with the right pathway at the right time, closing persistent treatment gaps in this common, overlooked and burdensome disease.

Indexed as

AlarminsBiologicsChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEosinophilsIL-33T2 inflammationTSLP

Identifiers

PMID42374013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.