ArticleThe patient2026
Experiences of People with Type 2 Diabetes and Healthcare Professionals with Once-Weekly Insulin Efsitora Alfa in QWINT Phase 3 Trials: Qualitative In-Trial Interviews.
Article in The patient, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with type 2 diabetes (PwD) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) often perceive daily basal insulin regimens as burdensome, and many PwD requiring basal insulin fail to achieve glycemic targets. Once-weekly insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora) demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and similar safety compared to daily basal insulin. To understand PwD perceptions of efsitora treatment and HCP perceptions of prescribing once-weekly efsitora, qualitative interview sub-studies with PwD and HCPs were performed as part of the QWINT trials.
methodsFour qualitative interview sub-studies explored the experiences of PwD and HCPs with efsitora during QWINT-1, QWINT-2, and QWINT-3 trials in the United States (US), Canada, or Mexico. Telephone interviews were conducted in English or Spanish and followed a semi-structured interview guide. De-identified interview transcripts were coded and analyzed deductively following a content analysis approach. The interview sample was described using sociodemographic and key clinical trial data.
resultsThe interviews included 72 PwD treated with efsitora and 22 HCPs. Across trials, PwD highlighted the convenience, flexibility, and ease of use of efsitora. Insulin-experienced PwD (QWINT-3) particularly valued the reduced injection frequency, ease of adherence, and improvements in glycemic control and overall well-being. Insulin-naïve PwD (QWINT-1 and QWINT-2) especially appreciated ease of use/convenience. Most PwD reported that efsitora improved their quality of life, expressed high satisfaction and confidence with its use, and were willing to continue treatment beyond the trial period. HCPs highlighted improved adherence, fewer injections, better glycemic control, and enhanced convenience for both PwD and clinical staff as the main advantages of once-weekly dosing. HCPs felt that PwD already on basal insulin and/or with adherence challenges or busy or irregular schedules might particularly benefit from once-weekly dosing. The most frequently cited disadvantage of efsitora was reduced opportunity for dose adjustment compared to daily regimens.
conclusionsThis qualitative study provides in-depth insights of the experiences of PwD and HCPs with efsitora treatment. Both groups emphasized its convenience, flexibility, and ease of use, while remaining confident in its glycemic control. These findings augment both clinical and patient-reported data and indicate that efsitora may mitigate challenges in diabetes management by reducing the burden and demands associated with conventional daily basal insulin regimens.
Identifiers
42374016What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.