ArticleBMC cancer2026
Targeted genomic DNA sequencing (506-gene panel) and whole-exome sequencing analysis of EBV-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEpstein-Barr virus-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (EBV+ IFDCS), recently reclassified in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms, is a rare mesenchymal and dendritic cell tumor distinct from conventional follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) in cellular origin and clinicopathological features. To address this, we present the largest sequencing cohort of EBV+ IFDCS to date, combining targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 12 cases and whole-exome sequencing (WES) of 3 cases. This study aims to elucidate the molecular characteristics of EBV+ IFDCS to better understand its pathogenesis and identify potential therapeutic targets. MATERIALS AND
methods12 EBV+ IFDCS cases were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a 506-gene panel, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 3 cases. The analysis focused on identifying copy number variations (CNVs), gene fusions, and pathogenic mutations. KEGG pathway analysis was conducted to explore enriched oncogenic pathways.
resultsCNV analysis via WES identified focal chromosomal deletions in 2 of 3 cases: 7p and 14q deletions in Case 1, and 17p deletion plus deep deletions in NPRL2 (chromosome 3) and STK11 (chromosome 19) in Case 6. While pathogenic/drug-sensitive SNVs varied across the 12 patients (Fig. 2). Only Patient 3 (48-year-old female, splenic classical subtype EBV+ IFDCS) was TMB-H (11.2 mutations/Mb, ≥ 10 mutations/Mb as threshold), harboring NQO1 p.P187S (VAF = 32.6%) and a germline PKHD1 Class 3 VUS. This case had no unique somatic mutations vs. low-TMB cases, with histological features (fascicular spindle cells, moderate lymphoplasmacytic infiltration) consistent with the classical subtype (Fig. 1A). KEGG pathway analysis revealed enrichment in PI3K-AKT, cell cycle, Notch, and EBV infection pathways. WES of Patients 1, 6, 10 showed TMB-L (1.8-3.5 mutations/Mb); Patient 3's TMB-H (11.2 mutations/Mb, ≥ 10 mutations/Mb as solid tumor threshold) was validated via targeted NGS (723× coverage). WES of TMB-L cases revealed predominant missense mutations/SNVs (C > T transitions: 50% of SNPs, Fig. 5C), with 3-9 somatic mutations per case and no shared mutations-highlighting potential potential high tumor heterogeneity, further supported by Patient 3's unique TMB-H phenotype.
conclusionThis study reveals the unique molecular landscape of EBV+ IFDCS, characterized by frequent NQO1 mutations and activation of key oncogenic pathways. These findings provide critical insights into the tumor's pathogenesis and suggest potential molecular targets for future therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.