ArticleBMC medical education2026
Assessment of knowledge, awareness, perceptions, and attitudes toward breast reconstruction practice among medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeBreast reconstruction (BR) following mastectomy is one component of comprehensive breast cancer care; however, its educational emphasis, accessibility, and cultural context vary across health systems, particularly in middle-income countries. Understanding how future physicians perceive BR within the local epidemiologic and health-system landscape is necessary to guide proportionate and culturally responsive medical education. This study assessed knowledge, awareness, perceptions, and attitudes toward BR among Jordanian medical students, with the aim of identifying educational gaps and barriers to practice.
methodsA national cross-sectional study was conducted among clinical-year medical students (years 4-6) from six Jordanian universities using a validated, self-administered questionnaire. A validated, self-administered questionnaire was distributed electronically via institutional mailing lists and verified student communication platforms. The survey was developed following expert review and piloting for clarity and cultural appropriateness. Data were analyzed descriptively to evaluate students' educational exposure, knowledge, confidence, and perceptions regarding BR.
resultsOf 391 respondents, 69.6% were female and all universities were represented. While 79% reported prior teaching on breast cancer, only 21% attended lectures specifically on BR, and 20.2% observed a procedure. Most rated their knowledge as basic (58.8%), with only 1.3% reporting advanced knowledge. Confidence in counseling patients was limited, with 7.2% feeling very confident. Awareness of key aspects varied: 42.2% recognized both immediate and delayed reconstruction, 55% knew both implant and autologous options, and 57.3% were unsure about insurance coverage. Reported barriers included financial cost (85.2%), lack of awareness (68.3%), and cultural or religious sensitivity (> 60%). Despite this, 88.7% agreed BR improves quality of life, and 75.7% supported greater curricular emphasis, with 68.3% seeking additional training.
conclusionJordanian medical students demonstrate supportive attitudes toward BR but significant educational and systemic gaps remain. Strengthening BR education and addressing cultural and financial barriers are essential to empower future physicians in promoting patient-centered cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.