Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374385›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Predictors of low trust in national healthcare systems in 30 countries.

Andreas Heinz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andreas HeinzDepartment of Health; Research Center for Public, Planetary and Digital Health, International University of Applied Sciences, Juri-Gagarin-Ring 152, 99084, Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany. andreas.heinz@iu.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2362-417X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrust in national healthcare systems is associated with health behaviour and patient outcomes. Individuals with high trust are more likely to participate in preventive services and adhere to medical advice, whereas low trust is linked to poorer health, reduced service use, and lower patient satisfaction. Despite extensive research on interpersonal trust in healthcare professionals, cross-national evidence on public trust in healthcare systems remains limited. This study examines levels of trust in 30 healthcare systems and identifies sociodemographic, attitudinal and experiential predictors associated with low trust.

methodsThe analysis draws on nationally representative data from the 2021 International Social Survey Programme, including 40,392 respondents aged 18 and older across 30 countries. Trust was dichotomised as high versus low trust. Multilevel logistic regression models with random intercepts at the country level were applied to account for data clustering. Individual level predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, health status, political orientation, attitudes toward vaccination and alternative medicine, perceptions of doctors, perceived inequalities in access, personal experiences with access barriers, and satisfaction with the last medical visit. At country level, the Corruption Perceptions Index was used.

resultsTrust showed wide variation across countries, peaking in Scandinavian nations and remaining comparatively low in countries such as Poland, Suriname, and Russia. Logistic regression indicates that a high level of trust is associated with low levels of corruption at country level. Younger respondents and women were more likely to report low trust. Poor self-rated health emerged as one of the strongest predictors of low trust. Negative attitudes toward vaccination and voting for extreme political parties were also associated with low trust. Furthermore, both personal experiences of access barriers and perceptions of unequal access were associated with a higher likelihood of low trust. Respondents dissatisfied with their last medical treatment and those with generally negative views of doctors showed markedly lower trust in the healthcare system.

conclusionTrust in national healthcare systems is associated with a broad set of individual and contextual factors. These findings highlight multiple potential leverage points for strengthening trust, ranging from improving doctor-patient interactions to addressing structural inequalities in healthcare access.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareTrustAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultHealthcare systemsInternational Social Survey ProgrammeTrust

Identifiers

PMID42374385
PMCPMC13317424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.