ArticleBMC medical education2026
Qualitative assessment of a virtual cardiovascular medical education program in Haiti: local physicians in-training experiences.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation of a Virtual Cardiology Curriculum to Address the Deficit of Cardiovascular Education in Haiti.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaiti faces challenges in accessing equitable healthcare and medical education due to limited resources. Cardiovascular disease burden is high, necessitating a well-trained cardiovascular workforce. The International Cardiology Curriculum Accessible by Remote Distance Learning (ICARDs) program, launched in 2019, addresses this need by providing virtual cardiovascular education. This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of internal medicine residents and physicians participating in the ICARDs program, focusing on their expectations, facilitators, barriers, and recommendations for improvement. A qualitative research approach was adopted, conducting three focus groups with participants in three different hospitals across Haiti.
methodsThe study utilized a Unified Theoretical Framework of Learning Theories as a structured framework to identify themes. A deductive content analysis was employed to identify barriers and facilitators and valuable information from participants' responses.
resultsParticipants expressed high expectations and reported positive experiences with the ICARDs program. They acknowledged its positive impact on patient care and the development of their medical skills. However, some concerns were raised regarding course content and irregularities in the program.
conclusionsThe ICARDs program fulfills participants' expectations for cardiovascular education and fosters a supportive community. To enhance its effectiveness, addressing content concerns and infrastructure limitations is essential. The study's findings provide valuable insights for program organizers to tailor the ICARDs program and better meet the participants' needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.