ArticleMalaria journal2026
Malaria among febrile patients during a yellow fever outbreak in Ghana: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBetween October 2021 and February 2022, there was an outbreak of yellow fever viral disease that spread within several districts in the northern part of Ghana. Malaria is the leading cause of death in most sub-Saharan countries including Ghana. It is important that surveillance is focused on malaria among febrile patients during a yellow fever outbreak in Ghana. This study investigated infection with malaria among febrile patients during a yellow fever outbreak in Ghana.
methodsThe study was a cross-sectional study conducted in two yellow fever outbreak sites (Wenchi and Damongo) and two non-outbreak sites (Kumbungu and Tamale). A total of 498 febrile patients from healthcare facilities were recruited in the rainy and dry seasons. A structured questionnaire was administered to collect patients' demographic information. Venous blood was collected from consented study participants for malaria parasite detection via microscopy and nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Total RNA was extracted from serum samples for the detection of yellow fever virus using Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).
resultsNone of the patients tested positive for yellow fever virus by RT-PCR. Out of a total of 498 febrile participants, 129/498 (25.90%) tested positive by PCR for P. falciparum parasites and 378 were examined for malaria microscopy with 54/378 (14.29%) testing positive to P. falciparum parasite detection. While there were 54/410 (13.17%) cases of P. falciparum infections via microscopy in the rainy season there was no positive infection in the dry season 0/88 (0%). However, the difference in malaria prevalence via PCR in the rainy and dry seasons was not significant (P > 0.05).
conclusionNucleic acid for yellow fever was not detected among all the febrile patients. High malaria prevalence was found in participants in the study sites, affecting preschool and the school-aged children the most. This suggests an underscoring urgent need for malaria interventions to mitigate high transmission within communities especially among school-based populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.