Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374477›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2026

Decoding glioblastoma evolution and heterogeneity through mechanistic modeling: implications for clinical translation.

Haowu Jiang, Wan Zhao, Hui Zhou, Rui Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haowu JiangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Center for Advanced Interdisciplinary Science and Biomedicine of IHM, Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, No.96, JinZhai Road, Baohe District, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, People's Republic of China. haowu.jiang@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2477-5970
Wan ZhaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230001, People's Republic of China.
Hui ZhouDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital), Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.
Rui SunDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, No.81, Meishan Road, Shushan District, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, People's Republic of China. sunrui@ahmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4054-1365

Funding

Anhui Medical University 0101099201Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities WK9100250104National Natural Science Foundation of China 32571192Natural Science Foundation of Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province 2025AHGXZK10011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and lethal primary brain tumors in adults, characterized by dynamic clonal evolution and extensive genomic, cellular, spatial, and microenvironmental heterogeneity. Multi-omics studies have revealed that GBM follows complex evolutionary trajectories involving genetic, epigenetic, transcriptional, and immune-microenvironmental remodeling as tumors grow, adapt to the brain microenvironment, and acquire therapeutic resistance. Increasing evidence suggests that GBM may originate from aberrant neural stem or progenitor cells, including those residing in the subventricular zone, and that glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) contribute to tumor propagation, heterogeneity, and recurrence. A key conceptual challenge is to reconcile hierarchical cancer stem cell models, in which GSCs are viewed as relatively stable tumor-propagating subpopulations, with dynamic state plasticity models, in which stem-like properties can be reversibly acquired or lost during transitions among proneural-like, mesenchymal-like, invasive, and therapy-tolerant states. Recent advances in single-cell profiling, spatial transcriptomics, lineage tracing, organoid culture, 3D bioprinting, genetically engineered models, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted computational modeling have substantially improved the ability to study these processes. However, no currently available model fully recapitulates human GBM heterogeneity, recurrence, treatment history, and tumor-microenvironment interactions. Therefore, model selection should be guided by clearly defined mechanistic questions rather than by reliance on any single platform. This review summarizes current advances in in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo, and computational models for studying GBM evolution and heterogeneity, and discusses how integrated model pipelines may improve preclinical drug testing, treatment-response prediction, and precision neuro-oncology.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplastic Stem CellsTranslational Research, BiomedicalTumor Microenvironment3D bioprintingArtificial intelligenceBrain organoidsGlioblastomaHeterogeneityin vivo modelsOrganotypic brain slicesStem cellsTumor evolution

Identifiers

PMID42374477
PMCPMC13576225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.