ReviewClinical transplantation and research2026
Future of xenotransplantation in Korea.
Review in Clinical transplantation and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the chronic shortage of human donor organs becomes an undeniable clinical reality, xenotransplantation has transitioned from a theoretical concept to the threshold of clinical integration. Recent successful pig-to-human kidney trials signify a pivotal milestone, shifting the scientific focus from feasibility to long-term sustainability and systemic implementation. This review critically evaluates the current status and future trajectory of xenotransplantation, challenging the "more is better" paradox of genetic engineering. It emphasizes the minimum viable edit set and the physiological superiority of miniature pigs overgrowth hormone receptor knockout models. Furthermore, the paper outlines a Korean-style governance model, integrating advanced digital transformation and specialized infrastructure. Key proposed strategies include (1) digital monitoring: implementing a noninvasive surveillance system utilizing donor-derived cell-free DNA, digital twins, and AI-driven early warning systems; (2) blockchain integration: establishing data integrity and tokenomics-based patient compliance through a sovereign medical coin system to incentivize lifelong surveillance; (3) infrastructure innovation: introducing the Hybrid Hospital Model, featuring a sterile barrier window between porcine and human surgical suites to achieve a zero-ischemia workflow. Finally, the study stresses the necessity of a Xenotransplantation Special Act and the collaboration between public organ procurement organizations and specialized private contract research organizations. By combining genetic minimalism and a robust legal framework, South Korea can establish itself as a global standard setter, transforming xenotransplantation into a standardized, manageable precision medical service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.