ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Physically active adults with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes exhibit normal cardiopulmonary exercise test responses versus healthy controls.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physically active adults with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes exhibit normal cardiopulmonary exercise test responses versus healthy controls.Physiological reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated whether physically active adults with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) differ from healthy controls in cardiopulmonary responses during incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Fifteen adults with uncomplicated T1DM (duration 15 ± 7 years) and 33 matched controls (age, sex, height, and BMI) performed an incremental cycling CPET and self-reported their weekly physical-activity levels. Pulmonary and cardiovascular variables were recorded at rest, ventilatory thresholds 1 and 2, and peak effort, with noninvasive cardiac function assessed by impedance cardiography. Weekly light-intensity activity frequency differed between groups according to the Mann-Whitney U test (p = 0.028), indicating a statistically significant distributional difference. However, the Hodges-Lehmann estimated median difference was not statistically significant because the 95% CI included zero (0-3). No other self-reported physical activity variables differed between the groups. In the linear mixed-effects models, no significant Group effects or Group × Stage interactions were observed for any cardiopulmonary variable during CPET. In this physically active and clinically selected cohort, adults with uncomplicated T1DM showed no statistically detectable differences in cardiopulmonary responses compared with healthy controls under the present CPET conditions. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate potential subclinical hemodynamic or autonomic differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.