ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2026
Sex Differences in Scalp-to-Cortex Distance: Implications for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Efficacy in Alcohol Use Disorder.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising intervention for alcohol use disorder (AUD), yet its efficacy varies widely. Scalp-to-cortex (STC) distance influences the strength of the induced electric field, and preliminary evidence suggests sex-specific craniofacial anatomy may contribute to STC variability. However, the implications of anatomical sex differences for TMS dosing in AUD remain unclear. This study examined whether STC distance and modeled electric field magnitude differ by sex, age, and alcohol use severity across common TMS targets.
methodsHigh-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging was acquired from 107 individuals with AUD (59 females, 48 males). Individualized finite-element head models were generated using SimNIBS to calculate STC distance and electric field strength at four cortical targets: medial prefrontal cortex (Afz), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (Fp1), and motor cortex (C3). Linear mixed-effects models assessed the effects of sex, age, and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score.
resultsSTC distance differed significantly across sites and was larger in males than in females, with sex differences strongest at Fp1 and C3. No sex differences were observed at Afz or F3. Higher AUDIT scores predicted greater STC distance independent of age. Electric field magnitude varied significantly across sites, with reduced values at midline regions (Afz, Fp1) relative to lateral sites (F3, C3). Electric field magnitude did not differ by sex overall. Age was associated with lower estimated electric field magnitude at the cortical surface. Exploratory sex-stratified analyses indicated a steeper age-related decline in females, particularly at medial prefrontal targets.
conclusionsSex-specific and age-related anatomical differences influence cortical depth and effective stimulation strength in individuals with AUD. These findings highlight the need for individualized and potentially sex-tailored TMS dosing strategies, particularly for midline prefrontal targets and for older females who may be more vulnerable to reduced TMS engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.