ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026
The potential of mollusc-associated fungi as anti-pathogens.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Molluscs are invertebrate organisms known to produce secondary metabolites that help them adapt to their environment. Aim: This study aims to explore the potential of fungi associated with molluscs and evaluate their secondary metabolites as potential antimicrobial agents against human pathogens. Methods: The fungi isolated from molluscs were examined both macroscopically and microscopically. Promising isolates were selected and cultured in bulk for phytochemical screening and thin-layer chromatography analysis. Extract from these fungal tested at a concentration 1,000 μg/disc. Observations were recorded every 12 hours over a 36 periods. Molecular identification of the selected isolated was performed using the Quick-DNA Magbead Plus Kit (Zymo Research, D4082). Statistical analysis was used to determine the significant differences isolates and control ( Results: The extract from fungal isolate G1T4 demonstrated both antibacterial and antifungal activity against all four test pathogens, as evidenced by the formation of clear inhibition zones. Extracts from isolates B3M6, B4T6, and B2L4 showed antibacterial effect against Conclusion: Molecular analysis revealed that isolate G1T4 is closely related to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.