ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic biomarkers for neuroblastoma risk stratification.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children, accounting for approximately 15% of pediatric oncology mortality. While risk-stratified therapy has improved survival, high-risk cases still face poor outcomes. Pretreatment inflammatory markers, including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have emerged as potential, cost-effective prognostic biomarkers to refine risk assessment and guide treatment intensity. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the associations between pretreatment NLR, PLR, and clinicopathological characteristics, and to evaluate their significance in neuroblastoma risk stratification. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients newly diagnosed with neuroblastoma at the Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, between March 2023 and July 2025. Data, including age, International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) classification, and International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS) criteria, were recorded. Pretreatment blood samples were analyzed for neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts to calculate NLR and PLR. The association between these ratios, clinicopathological characteristics, and risk groups was analyzed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: ROC curve analysis established optimal cutoff values for NLR and PLR at 0.98 and 104.6, respectively, for differentiating high-risk from low/intermediate-risk patients. The combined NLR-PLR model demonstrated superior predictive performance, yielding an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.833. Both NLR and PLR showed significant positive correlations with neuroblastoma risk stratification. Notably, patients with elevated baseline NLR and PLR values were significantly more likely to present with advanced disease stages compared to their lower-risk counterparts. These data suggest that the integration of NLR and PLR into a dual-index score synergistically enhances the accuracy of risk discrimination. Conclusions: Pretreatment NLR and PLR are potent, cost-effective, and easily accessible biomarkers that correlate significantly with high-risk neuroblastoma and poor prognostic indicators in unadjusted analyses. Incorporating these inflammatory indices into standard staging protocols may improve the precision of initial risk stratification, allowing for more personalized therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.