Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375398›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026

Hoang Thi Anh Phuong, Nguyen Dinh Vinh, Nguyen Xuan Hoa, Vo Thi Minh Tam, Phan Vu Hai

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hoang Thi Anh PhuongDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Tay Nguyen University, Buon Ma Thuot City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Dinh VinhFaculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Xuan HoaSchool of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Vinh University, Vinh City, Vietnam.
Vo Thi Minh TamSchool of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Vinh University, Vinh City, Vietnam.
Phan Vu HaiSchool of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Vinh University, Vinh City, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The global poultry industry is under pressure to reduce its reliance on antibiotics, necessitating the search for effective alternatives. Pathogenic Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of shallot extract ( Methods: A total of 300 1-day-old J-Dabaco broilers were randomized to six treatments ( Results: Supplementation with FS, especially the 3% dose (FS3), significantly improved body weight gain by 9.4% and restored survival to 100%, matching the NC and AB groups. FS3 enhanced gut health by reducing the densities of pathogenic Conclusion: Collectively, these findings demonstrate that

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChickensEscherichia coli InfectionsLactiplantibacillus plantarumPlant ExtractsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsDietDrinking WaterEscherichia coliFermentationAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrinking WaterPlant ExtractsAntibiotic alternativeBroilerEscherichia coliFermentationLactiplantibacillus plantarum

Identifiers

PMID42375398
PMCPMC13313892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.