Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375426›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026

Anti-

Amal M El-Feky, Amany M Mohamed, Magdy A Ayad, Nehal M Khairy, Raafat Mohamed Shaapan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amal M El-FekyPharmacognosy Department, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Amany M MohamedParasitology and Animal Diseases Department, Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Magdy A AyadDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya.
Nehal M KhairyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Egypt Drug Authority (EDA), (Formerly NODCAR), Giza, Egypt.
Raafat Mohamed ShaapanZoonotic Diseases Department, Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aim: This study aimed to explore the phytochemical constituents and efficacy of Methods: The assessment of chlorophyll, carotenoid, carbohydrate, total phenolic, and flavonoid contents in the leaves of Results: This study quantified the total phenolic and flavonoid contents 267.54 ± 0.61 mg GAE/g and 514.89 ± 0.20 mg rutin/g, respectively, and identified 51 compounds, including 14 phenolic acids and their derivatives, 30 flavonoids, 6 coumarins, and 1 anthocyanin. Both infected-treated mice groups (G2 & G3) showed a considerable improvement in Conclusion:

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidium parvumPlant ExtractsAnimalsMaleMicePlant LeavesAntiprotozoal AgentsPlant ExtractsAnti-CryptosporidiumNatural productPhytochemicalSchefflera arboricola L

Identifiers

PMID42375426
PMCPMC13314321

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.