Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375442›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026

Influence of

Elisa Martello, Muhammad Irfan Malik, Corrado Biolatti, Francesca Perondi, Ilaria Biasato, Maria Teresa Capucchio

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisa MartelloCentre for Evidence Based Healthcare, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Muhammad Irfan MalikDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Corrado BiolattiIndependent Researcher, Baar, Switzerland.
Francesca PerondiDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Ilaria BiasatoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Maria Teresa CapucchioDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The quality of meat, short life cycles, prolific nature, and efficient feed utilization make rabbits an interesting farm animal and an emerging business entity. Intensive farming still poses many types of stress that can lead to multifactorial gastrointestinal syndrome. The ban on antibiotics and the need for sustainable solutions make probiotic supplementation a possible strategy to improve rabbit growth performance. Aim: This study aimed to characterize the effect of the probiotic in rabbits by measuring fecal parameters, including weight, dry matter, pH, and consistency, to confirm their beneficial use. Methods: To perform a multicentric study, three trials were organized, including 30 animals/trial, and were randomly allocated into two groups: a TRT, with the administration of an oral paste containing Results: Significant increases in fecal weight were observed in the CTR and TRT groups across the 45-day study period ( Conclusion: Our findings suggest that

Indexed as

FecesLactobacillus acidophilusProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleRabbitsFecal parametersLactobacillusProbioticRabbits

Identifiers

PMID42375442
PMCPMC13314353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.