Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375714›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2026

Economic impact of medication management by clinical pharmacists in a urology department.

Ulrich Warnke, Benjamin Ziehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ulrich WarnkePharmacy Department, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gGmbH, Potsdam, Germany.
Benjamin ZiehrPharmacy Department, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The effectiveness of pharmaceutical care for urological inpatients has been shown, but this investigation aims to evaluate the economic benefit of clinical pharmacy services in a urology department. Return on investment (ROI) is to be determined. Material and methods: Medication management comprised pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) that were carried out by ward-based pharmacists following analysis of drug-related problems. Each pharmaceutical intervention was assigned a probability value indicating the likelihood of an adverse drug event (ADE) occurring without intervention. Assuming that each ADE results in a longer hospital stay, the average case costs for the urology department per day were used as the potential savings. Results: A total of 295 PIs were documented by the clinical pharmacists within 1,495 included patient days. The recorded acceptance rate by physicians was 77.97%. PIs prevented approximately 60 ADE and thus a potential extension of hospital stay of 132 days. Clinical pharmacy services resulted in avoided costs totaling €112,256, thus giving a ROI of 881%. Conclusions: The present investigation demonstrates the economic benefits of clinical pharmacy services for a surgical specialty, namely urology. PIs improve medication safety. Ward-based pharmacists have become a vital part of the urology care team.

Indexed as

avoided costsclinical pharmacy servicesmedication managementmedication safetypharmaceutical interventionreturn on investmenturologyward-based pharmacists

Identifiers

PMID42375714
PMCPMC13312219

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.