Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375731›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2026

Enfortumab vedotin demonstrates consistent efficacy in platinum- and ICI-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients irrespective of prior response: a multicenter real-world study.

Shunsuke Watanabe, Yuichi Kitagawa, Asuka Uchiyama, Yuya Oishi, Hiroki Tanaka, Gaku Ishikawa, Shinya Watanabe, Eito Suzuki, Kyohei Watanabe, Yuto Matsushita and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shunsuke WatanabeDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yuichi KitagawaDepartment of Urology, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Asuka UchiyamaDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yuya OishiDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Hiroki TanakaDepartment of Urology, JA Shizuoka Kohseiren Enshu Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Gaku IshikawaDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Shinya WatanabeDepartment of Urology, Fujieda Municipal General Hospital, Fujieda, Japan.
Eito SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Japan.
Kyohei WatanabeDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yuto MatsushitaDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Hiromitsu WatanabeDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Keita TamuraDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Rikiya MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Chutoen General Medical Center, Kakegawa, Japan.
Daisuke MotoyamaDepartment of Developed Studies for Advanced Robotic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Masao NagataDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu Medical Center, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Teruo InamotoDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting nectin-4 and is widely used for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after prior systemic therapies. However, it remains unclear whether EV efficacy is influenced by responses to preceding platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study evaluated the relationship between responses to prior therapy and EV outcomes in a real-world cohort. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients with mUC who received EV between December 2021 and March 2024. All patients had previously undergone PBC and ICI. Based on responses to these therapies, patients were classified as responders (complete or partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease). Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate factors associated with survival outcomes. Results: The overall EV ORR was 41.7%. EV responders demonstrated significantly longer PFS and OS than non-responders. No significant differences in EV efficacy were observed between responders and non-responders to prior chemotherapy or ICI. Multivariable analyses confirmed that prior treatment response was not independently associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions: EV response was strongly associated with prolonged survival. Importantly, consistent antitumor activity was observed regardless of prior treatment efficacy, suggesting that even patients refractory to PBC or ICI may derive meaningful benefit. EV should be offered promptly even for patients with double-refractory mUC, as the presence of a prior non-response does not signify compromised efficacy.

Indexed as

enfortumab vedotinmetastatic urothelial carcinomaobjective response rateoverall survivalprior treatmentprogression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID42375731
PMCPMC13312197

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.