ArticleCentral European journal of urology2026
Enfortumab vedotin demonstrates consistent efficacy in platinum- and ICI-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients irrespective of prior response: a multicenter real-world study.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting nectin-4 and is widely used for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after prior systemic therapies. However, it remains unclear whether EV efficacy is influenced by responses to preceding platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study evaluated the relationship between responses to prior therapy and EV outcomes in a real-world cohort. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients with mUC who received EV between December 2021 and March 2024. All patients had previously undergone PBC and ICI. Based on responses to these therapies, patients were classified as responders (complete or partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease). Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate factors associated with survival outcomes. Results: The overall EV ORR was 41.7%. EV responders demonstrated significantly longer PFS and OS than non-responders. No significant differences in EV efficacy were observed between responders and non-responders to prior chemotherapy or ICI. Multivariable analyses confirmed that prior treatment response was not independently associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions: EV response was strongly associated with prolonged survival. Importantly, consistent antitumor activity was observed regardless of prior treatment efficacy, suggesting that even patients refractory to PBC or ICI may derive meaningful benefit. EV should be offered promptly even for patients with double-refractory mUC, as the presence of a prior non-response does not signify compromised efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.