Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375827›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026

From potential to podium: what we still don't know about talent identification and development in Para athletics, a scoping review.

Annmarie Carroll, Alison O'Riordan, Kate Pumpa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annmarie CarrollSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Alison O'RiordanParalympics Ireland, Irish Sport HQ, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.
Kate PumpaSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to identify and develop talented athletes effectively can increase the likelihood of sporting success and thus increase returns on invested resources for stakeholders. Talent identification and development (TIdD) is well studied in sports which are highly monetised, such as soccer and rugby, however, it is less researched in Para sport. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and map the current landscape of research on TIdD in Para athletics (PA) to allow for evidence-based recommendations to be made for applied practice. This study followed a five-step framework for conducting scoping reviews and searched five major databases [PubMed, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO (via EBSCO), ERIC (via ProQuest), and SCOPUS (via Elsevier)], reference lists and existing networks, relevant organisations and conferences, for research pertaining to TIdD in PA. The search returned 1,786 results, of which, nine papers were included in this review. Of the nine publications related to TIdD in PA, five were published within the last 5 years, and four reported on physical testing data. The most investigated track and field discipline was sprinting and there was a notable absence of representation for several classifications. The review found that TIdD practices in PA are primarily centered on physical assessments and the analysis of demographic data, including birthdates and impairment-related factors. Further research is needed in this area, with research teams encouraged to give greater attention to diversity and critically reflect on the broader applicability of their findings.

Indexed as

athlete developmentPara athleticsPara track and fieldtalent developmenttalent identification

Identifiers

PMID42375827
PMCPMC13311012

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.