ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026
Reduced-risk insecticide programs for managing direct pests in apple orchards: Efficacy and limitations.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Direct apple pests, including codling moth ( Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of insecticide programs based on modern reduced-risk chemistries against key direct apple pests, with a particular focus on the experimental insecticide cyantraniliprole. Methods: A replicated field trial was conducted in Urbana, Illinois, USA, during the 2013 growing season. Five insecticide programs plus an untreated control were compared using a randomized complete block design. Fruit damage assessments were conducted mid-season and at harvest. Results: All insecticide treatments significantly reduced ( Conclusion: Reduced-risk insecticides, such as cyantraniliprole, represent valuable tools in IPM programs against Lepidopteran pests. However, the consistently limited efficacy of chemical means to control plum curculio underscores the necessity of integrating non-chemical control tactics for sustainable management of this key pest. This study, conducted in 2013, provides a foundational assessment that contemporary IPM must integrate newer chemistries and non-chemical strategies to address potential resistance and evolving pest pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.