ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
Stress-related neuroplasticity and developmental vulnerability in functional neurological disorder: from adverse experience to maladaptive overlearning.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) is increasingly understood as a disorder of brain functioning rather than structural damage. While contemporary predictive coding models have provided important insights into the generation of functional symptoms, they offer limited explanations for vulnerability, developmental risk, and the striking association between FND and adverse life experiences. A substantial body of evidence indicates that early-life stress, trauma, and chronic adversity are overrepresented in individuals with FND and are associated with enduring neurobiological alterations in brain systems central to emotional processing, interoception, and motor control. In this paper, we propose that stress-related neuroplasticity constitutes a key developmental substrate that predisposes the brain to maladaptive learning processes, increasing the likelihood that salient bodily states become rigidly encoded and persist as functional symptoms. We review evidence linking trauma exposure to long-lasting changes in limbic, paralimbic, and sensorimotor circuits implicated in FND, including the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and supplementary motor areas. We further examine autonomic and neuroendocrine abnormalities and gender-related biological factors that may amplify these effects. We argue that these convergent findings support a model in which FND emerges from excessive, stress-biased neuroplasticity that promotes overlearning of bodily predictions, rather than from a primary failure of belief updating. This framework provides a coherent account of vulnerability, symptom persistence, and heterogeneity in FND, and offers a biologically grounded bridge between developmental risk factors and contemporary computational models of functional symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.