ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Integrating Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with intervention mapping to enhance self-care in type 2 diabetes: a conceptual framework.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-care in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains suboptimal despite evidence for the effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in chronic illness management. This conceptual paper integrates ACT-based psychological flexibility processes with Steps 1-4 of the Intervention Mapping framework to develop a brief, replicable group intervention for primary care. Acceptance, cognitive defusion, and values clarification are specified as modifiable determinants of barriers in self-monitoring, diet, exercise, and medication adherence, organized into performance-determinant matrices to guide method selection. Theory-based methods are operationalized through culturally adaptable metaphors and experiential exercises. This framework addresses methodological gaps in translating ACT to diabetes care, aligns with biopsychosocial models in health psychology, and offers a testable foundation for future randomized trials on multicultural efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.