Evidence mapPaperPMID 42376301Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society

Emerging treatments in fungal keratitis.

Aafreen Bari, Tushar Agarwal, Rajesh Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aafreen BariDr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Tushar AgarwalDr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rajesh SinhaDr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal keratitis is a major cause of corneal blindness, particularly in tropical and low-resource settings, and remains challenging to manage due to delayed diagnosis, limited drug penetration, emerging resistance, and host-mediated tissue damage. Conventional antifungal therapies, including natamycin and voriconazole, are often inadequate in deep, severe, or refractory infections, underscoring the need for alternative strategies. This narrative review summarizes and critically appraises emerging treatments in fungal keratitis, with a focus on recent pharmacological advances, innovative drug delivery systems, adjunctive therapies, and immunomodulatory approaches. Newer-generation azoles, echinocandins, and repurposed agents are discussed alongside advanced formulations such as liposomal amphotericin B, solubilized natamycin, nanoparticle-based delivery, and intrastromal drug administration. Adjunctive modalities, including photo-activated corneal cross-linking, photodynamic therapy, therapeutic contact lenses, and low-temperature plasma, are reviewed for their antimicrobial and corneal-stabilizing effects. The role of immunomodulators in mitigating excessive inflammation while preserving antifungal defense is also highlighted. In addition, evolving strategies for managing infections caused by emerging and fungus-like pathogens, including Pythium

Indexed as

Emerging treatmentsfungal keratitisrecent advancestargeted treatment

Identifiers

PMID42376301
PMCPMC13313658

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.