ReviewOTO open
Transgender Women's Voice Outcome After Laryngochondroplasty-A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Objective acoustic voice outcomes following direct laryngochondroplasty in transgender women: a technique-specific cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review the literature on voice outcomes following laryngochondroplasty (LCP). Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Review Methods: A systematic review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies published in English between January 1990 and January 27, 2026, evaluating voice quality after LCP, were eligible. Included study designs were randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series. Extracted data encompassed study design, sample size, surgical technique, voice assessment methods, and reported outcomes. Results: Of 344 articles identified, 126 duplicates were removed, and 162 articles were excluded by screening title and abstract. The full texts of the remaining 44 articles were reviewed, and 20 met the eligibility criteria, representing a cohort of 760 patients. Most studies relied on subjective or qualitative voice assessments; only two incorporated objective acoustic analyses. Postoperative voice changes were reported in 98 of 777 patients (12.6%), more in patients operated via the transcervical approach (13%), than via the transvestibular approach (5.2%). Fewer reports of voice changes were found when utilizing the transcervical technique with vocal fold localization than without (2.8% vs 29.6%, respectively). More reports of voice changes were found in studies from lead authors affiliated with Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery departments than in those affiliated with plastic surgery departments (15.3% vs 9.9%, respectively). Conclusions: Voice changes may occur following LCP, and the surgical approach may affect the risk. Larger prospective studies using standardized and objective voice measures are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.