Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376612›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026

Development and initial validation of a scale assessing sources of decision hesitation in patients with lung cancer invited to participate in drug clinical trials.

Yueting Huang, Wanzhen Li, Weilin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yueting HuangDepartment of Nursing, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wanzhen LiDepartment of Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Weilin ZhangDepartment of Nursing, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and preliminarily validate a theory-driven, nursing-relevant scale measuring sources of decision hesitation for patients with lung cancer who have been invited to participate in drug clinical trials. Methods: A two-stage cross-sectional study was conducted between April 2024 and September 2025. The initial item pool was established via literature review and semi-structured patient interviews. Two rounds of Delphi consultation and pre-testing were conducted to form the preliminary scale. A total of 407 eligible patients with lung cancer from a tertiary hospital in Sichuan were enrolled. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, correlation analysis and reliability tests were performed to verify scale psychometric properties. Results: The final 23-item scale captures six key sources of decision hesitation: perceived trial risk, perceived trial value, perceived patient-physician trust, perceived family influence, perceived resource barriers, and perceived self-efficacy. The six-factor model showed acceptable fit indices. The scale demonstrated good content validity (scale-level content validity index [S-CVI] = 0.97), convergent validity ( Conclusions: This study provides initial psychometric evidence for a scale capturing six key sources of decision hesitation among patients with lung cancer invited to participate in drug clinical trials. The scale shows promise as a screening and supportive assessment tool; however, further prospective, multicenter validation is required to confirm its predictive validity and generalizability. Trial registration: This study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No. ChiCTR2400093749).

Indexed as

Clinical trialDecision hesitationLung cancerPsychometric validationScale development

Identifiers

PMID42376612
PMCPMC13312214

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.