ArticleCurrent research in food science2026
Elucidating the interaction between pyrazine flavor compounds and coffee proteins: Insights from multiscale structural and molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Atlas of Key Food Odorants Reveals Mixture-Level Organization and Enables Generative Aroma Design.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For roasted coffee, its distinctive aroma is imparted by pyrazine compounds. Understanding how they interact with coffee proteins (CP) is crucial for controlling coffee flavor retention. This study demonstrated that the type and number of alkyl groups determine the binding strength between pyrazines and CP. At 2.00 and 10.00 mg/L of the pyrazine compounds, the binding affinity of CP for the pyrazines followed the order: 2,3,5-trimethylpyrazine (TRP) > 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazine (EDP) > 2-ethyl-3-methylpyrazine (EMP) > 2-ethylpyrazine (EP). Multi-spectroscopic analysis indicated that pyrazines quenched the fluorescence of CP through both dynamic and static quenching processes, primarily via binding near Tyr and Trp residues. Hydrophobic interactions primarily governed the binding of TRP and EDP to CP, whereas van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding were dominant for EP and EMP. Pyrazine binding induced the aggregation of CP, with TRP exhibiting the most pronounced effect on secondary structure, including a decrease in α-helix content and an increase in β-sheet content indicative of partial protein unfolding. Molecular simulation confirmed that TRP exhibited the smallest highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) energy gap (5.338505 eV) with CP, indicating a greater propensity for interaction. The study revealed the relationship between pyrazine structure and its binding capacity to CP, providing a theoretical basis for flavor regulation during coffee processing and storage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.