Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42376907›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2026

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection Performance Analysis and Comparison on Effective Feature Selection.

Tianxin Jiang, Junbiao Liu, Dinghan Hu, Mengyuan Diao, Jiuwen Cao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianxin JiangMachine Learning and I-Health International Cooperation Base of Zhejiang Province and School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Junbiao LiuMachine Learning and I-Health International Cooperation Base of Zhejiang Province and School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Dinghan HuMachine Learning and I-Health International Cooperation Base of Zhejiang Province and School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Mengyuan DiaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiuwen CaoMachine Learning and I-Health International Cooperation Base of Zhejiang Province and School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFE0100100National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFE0205400National Natural Science Foundation of China U1909209Natural Science Key Foundation of Zhejiang Province LZ24F030010R\&D Program of Zhejiang 2022C03136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHow to reduce the occurrence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), screen potential IHCA patients, and advance the treatment of IHCA are urgent problems to be solved in clinic. In this study, we tried to develop a model to predict whether patients will develop IHCA based on the data of patients who have just been admitted to hospital and evaluate the influence of different feature selection methods on machine learning (ML) models. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 25 149 patients were included in the study; 320 developed IHCA. We chose three feature selection methods (Student's t-test and Chi-square test, regression analysis and correlation analysis) and four ML models (AdaBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression). Each ML model was trained and evaluated using raw and feature-selected data; as a result, we got 16 models. AUROC, AUPRC, accuracy, recall, precision, and specificity are used to evaluate the model. The XGBoost model has the best performance with an AUROC of 0.987 (95% CI 0.984-0.988), an AUPRC of 0.763, an accuracy of 0.992, a recall of 0.695, a precision of 0.723, and a specificity of 0.996. The most significant predictors are age, albumin, sinus arrhythmia, activated partial thromboplastin time, and protein.

conclusionsDifferent feature selection methods have different effects on different ML models. The predictive model developed using the XGBoost algorithm is the best predictor of whether patients will develop IHCA.

Indexed as

Heart ArrestHospitalizationMachine LearningAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsChinaClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsPredictive Value of TestsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorscorrelation analysisfeature selectionin‐hospital cardiac arrestmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42376907
PMCPMC13316806

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.